Материал из Антэкология /// Anthecology
Перейти к: навигация, поиск
AID: 0000600350
Temporal stability of pollinator preference in an alpine plant community and its implications for the evolution of floral traits
Oecologia, . Т. 166. 3. С. 671680 (10).
A traditional view of diverse floral traits is that they reflect differences in foraging preferences of pollinators. The role of pollinators in the evolution of floral traits has been questioned recently by broad community surveys, especially studies concerning variation in pollinator assemblages and visitation frequency, which suggest a diminished role of pollinators in floral evolution. Here, we investigate the relationships between six categories of floral traits of 29 species and 10 pollinator functional groups in an alpine meadow in the Hengduan Mountains of China, over three consecutive years. Simpson’s diversity index was used to estimate the level of pollinator generalization of each plant species by considering both pollinator groups and their relative visitation frequencies. Multivariate analyses indicated that eight of the ten pollinator groups showed constant preferences for at least two floral traits, leading to a relatively stable level of ecological generalization for most floral traits (two out of three categories), despite the fact that the level of generalization of the entire community varied across years. Shape preferences of butterflies, honeybees and beeflies varied such that open flowers exhibited a lower level of ecological generalization in 2007 than closed flowers, in contrast with the other 2 years. These results suggest that temporally stabilized preferences of diverse pollinators may contribute to the evolution of specialized versus generalized floral traits; however, their role may be moderated by variation in community structure, including both the composition and abundance of plants and pollinators.

Error: No contents found at URL https://api.altmetric.com/v1/doi/10.1007/s00442-011-1910-7.

Показатель Значение Min Max Av
Место из 1352
Рейтинг публикации PAMS 0 0 0.89992 80.77% 628
Число читателей в Mendeley PAMMR 0 0 35.54 80.99% 429
Число читателей в CiteuLike PAMCULR 0 0 0.1 96.67% 619
Число читателей в Connotea PAMCR 0 0 0 99.7% 1176
Число читателей в Altmetric PAMR 0 0 35.64 80.99% 429
Число цитирований в Wikipedia PAMWPC 0 0 0.1 95.04% 235
Число цитирований в Twitter PAMTC 0 0 0.36 87.8% 607
Число цитирований в Google Plus PAMGPC 0 0 0 98.89% 804
Число цитирований в блогах PAMBC 0 0 0.06 91.35% 543
Число цитирований в Facebook PAMFBC 0 0 0.06 95.78% 226
Число цитирований в новостях PAMNC 0 0 0 98.22% 73
Число цитирований на Peer Review Sites PAMPRSC 0 0 0 100% 1088
Число цитирований на Reddit PAMRC 0 0 0 99.85% 1089
Число цитирований на Research Highliht Platform PAMRHPC 0 0 0 99.19% 802
Число цитирований на Q&A PAMQAC 0 0 0 99.93% 1089

Связи в публикации не описаны.
TODO: Проверить наличие чистого заголовка
TODO: Форматирование заголовка